Current:Home > InvestThe Supreme Court upholds a tax on foreign income over a challenge backed by business interests-LoTradeCoin
The Supreme Court upholds a tax on foreign income over a challenge backed by business interests
View Date:2025-01-14 13:32:53
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld a tax on foreign income over a challenge backed by business and anti-regulatory interests, declining their invitation to weigh in on a broader, never-enacted tax on wealth.
The justices, by a 7-2 vote, left in place a provision of a 2017 tax law that is expected to generate $340 billion, mainly from the foreign subsidiaries of domestic corporations that parked money abroad to shield it from U.S. taxes.
The law, passed by a Republican Congress and signed by then-President Donald Trump, includes a provision that applies to companies that are owned by Americans but do their business in foreign countries. It imposes a one-time tax on investors’ shares of profits that have not been passed along to them, to offset other tax benefits.
But the larger significance of the ruling is what it didn’t do. The case attracted outsize attention because some groups allied with the Washington couple who brought the case argued that the challenged provision is similar to a wealth tax, which would apply not to the incomes of the very richest Americans but to their assets, like stock holdings. Such assets now get taxed only when they are sold.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in his majority opinion that “nothing in this opinion should be read to authorize any hypothetical congressional effort to tax both an entity and its shareholders or partners on the same undistributed income realized by the entity.”
Underscoring the limited nature of the court’s ruling, Kavanaugh said as he read a summary of his opinion in the courtroom, “the precise and very narrow question” of the 2017 law “is the only question we answer.”
The court ruled in the case of Charles and Kathleen Moore, of Redmond, Washington. They challenged a $15,000 tax bill based on Charles Moore’s investment in an Indian company, arguing that the tax violates the 16th Amendment. Ratified in 1913, the amendment allows the federal government to impose an income tax on Americans. Moore said in a sworn statement that he never received any money from the company, KisanKraft Machine Tools Private Ltd.
Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch, wrote in dissent that the Moores paid taxes on an investment “that never yielded them a penny.” Under the 16th Amendment, Thomas wrote, the only income that can be taxed is “income realized by the taxpayer.”
A ruling for the Moores could have called into question other provisions of the tax code and threatened losses to the U.S. Treasury of several trillion dollars, Kavanaugh noted, echoing the argument made by the Biden administration.
The case also had kicked up ethical concerns and raised questions about the story the Moores’ lawyers told in court filings. Justice Samuel Alito rejected calls from Senate Democrats to step away from the case because of his ties to David Rivkin, a lawyer who is representing the Moores.
Alito voted with the majority, but did not join Kavanaugh’s opinion. Instead, he joined a separate opinion written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett. Barrett wrote that the issues in the case are more complicated than Kavanaugh suggests.
Public documents show that Charles Moore’s involvement with the company, including serving as a director for five years, is far more extensive than court filings indicate.
The case is Moore v. U.S., 22-800.
___
Associated Press writer Fatima Hussein contributed to this report.
___
Follow the AP’s coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court.
veryGood! (2)
Related
- Megan Fox and Machine Gun Kelly are expecting their first child together
- Museum in Switzerland to pull famous paintings by Monet, van Gogh over Nazi looting fears
- Princess Kate turns heads in Jenny Packham dress amid return for Trooping the Colour event
- Kourtney Kardashian Shares Adorable New Photos of Baby Rocky With Travis Barker on Father's Day
- Katharine Hayhoe’s Post-Election Advice: Fight Fear, Embrace Hope and Work Together
- 6 injured in shooting at home in suburban Detroit
- You're not Warren Buffet. You should have your own retirement investment strategy.
- 3 men set for pleas, sentencings in prison killing of Boston gangster James ‘Whitey’ Bulger
- Mechanic dies after being 'trapped' under Amazon delivery van at Florida-based center
- Imagining SEC name change possibilities from Waffle House to Tito's to Nick Saban
Ranking
- Sister Wives’ Kody Brown Explains His Stance on His Daughter Gwendlyn Brown’s Sexuality
- Northeast and Midwest prepare for dangerously hot temperatures and heat dome
- NBA Finals Game 5 Mavericks vs. Celtics: Predictions, betting odds
- 7 shot when gunfire erupts at a pop-up party in Massachusetts
- 'Yellowstone's powerful opening: What happened to Kevin Costner's John Dutton?
- Gretchen Walsh makes Olympic team one night after shattering world record
- Dodgers pitcher Yoshinobu Yamamoto exits start vs. Royals with triceps tightness
- Rachel Morin Murder Case: Suspect Arrested in Connection to Maryland Woman's Death
Recommendation
-
Denver district attorney is investigating the leak of voting passwords in Colorado
-
New Research Finds Most of the World’s Largest Marine Protected Areas Have Inadequate Protections
-
Arizona lawmakers pass budget closing $1.4 billion deficit
-
Strong winds, steep terrain hamper crews battling Los Angeles area’s first major fire of the year
-
Bev Priestman fired as Canada women’s soccer coach after review of Olympic drone scandal
-
Charles Barkley announces retirement from broadcasting: Next year is going to be my last year on television
-
Stock market today: Asian shares mostly lower as China reports factory output slowed
-
Mount Washington race won for record eighth time by Colorado runner Joseph Gray